Optimiser son CPU sans overcloking

Optimiser son CPU sans overcloking - CPU - Overclocking, Cooling & Modding

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 16:54:21    

:love:  allechante idée , un ami m'a envoyé un programme denomé CPUBURN4 qui apperement optimiserai la puissance du CPU :heink:  
 
Pour le moment je ne l'ai pas installé de peur de faire des betise et ne sachant pas si ce "programme" etait compatible avec mon proc (P4C 3GHz)  :??:  
 
Je viens donc vous demander conseil sur ce programme  
 
Et pkoi pas d'autre qui aurai les meme utilitée  :whistle:  
 
je joint le readme du programme en esperant pas me faire taper sur les doigt  :sarcastic:  
 

Citation :

*** WARNING ***    These program is designed to heavily load CPU chips.
Undercooled, overclocked or otherwise weak systems may fail causing data
loss (filesystem corruption) and possibly permanent damage to electronic
components.  Nor will it catch all flaws.   *** USE AT YOUR OWN RISK ***
 
N E W   burnK7  for  AMD Athlon/Duron/Thurderbird has been released.
 
These programs are designed to load x86 CPUs as heavily as possible for
the purposes of system testing.  They have been optimized for different
processors.  FPU and ALU instructions are coded an assembler endless loop.
They do not test every instruction.  The goal has been to maximize heat
production from the CPU, putting stress on the CPU itself, cooling
system, motherboard (especially voltage regulators) and power supply
(likely cause of burnBX/MMX errors).
 
burnP5   is optimized for Intel Pentium w&w/o MMX processors
    P6   is for Intel PentiumPro, PentiumII&III and Celeron CPUs
    K6   is for AMD K6 processors
    K7   is for AMD Athlon/Duron processors
    MMX  is to test cache/memory interfaces on all CPUs with MMX
    BX   is an alternate cache/memory test for Intel CPUs
 
 
burn* will run endlessly _UNLESS_ an arithmetic error is detected.
Check up on it with the Task Manager.  It will terminate with an
error code of 1 if a computational error is detected.  It checks
every 3-8 seconds. I haven't seen any terminations, the CPUs always
lockup first. Let me know if errors happen to you.
 
I heartily recommend using Mikael Olsson's `runprio` program (available
at SimTel) to run burn* at HIGH priority. This reduces system performance
to crawl, but gives ~5'C hotter CPU temperatures because burn* gets
96% of all CPU cycles rather than 72% at normal priority.  DO NOT try
Real-Time Priority, it gets no more. Of course, you can still run
Sysmon/PerfMon and temperature sensors programs to monitor progress.  
 
Thanks to Otto Strudel who ported burnK7 and to Kevin Hughes
<kevin@klsoft.force9.co.uk> who used MING to port my Linux
sources to the Win32 *.exe's included in the .zip .
 
 
TO RUN:   runprio -x high burnp6.exe from a DOS box or Start->Run
TO KILL:  ^C or Ctl-Alt-Del to the TaskManager, highlight & End task.
 
burnBX and burnMMX are essentially very intense RAM testers.  They can
also take an optional parameter indicating the RAM size to be tested:
 
  A =  2 kB   E =  32 kB   I = 512 kB   M =  8 MB
  B =  4      F =  64      J =   1 MB   N = 16
  C =  8      G = 128      K =   2      O = 32
  D = 16      H = 256      L =   4      P = 64
 
`burnBX L` (4 MB) and `burnMMX F` (64 kB) are the default sizes.
A-E mostly test L1 cache, F-H test L2 cache, and H-P force their way
to RAM.  But even A-E will have some cacheline writeouts to RAM.
 
In spite of it's name, burnBX can be run on any chipset [RAM controller]
and tests alot more than the RAM controller.  Unfortunately, burnBX is
not optimal on AMD K6 processors. burnMMX is preferable for any CPU that
has an MMX unit.
 
burnBX/MMX needs about 72 MB of total RAM + swap to start (not necessarily
free), but doesn't use this much unless you request it.  They will
throw a GPF if you don't have enough swap.  If you don't want to
add more, you can adjust the .bss section downward as indicated in the
source comments.  I use very simple memory management. They can also
test swap, and at least on my system, I can run 2*`burnBX 8` with 128
MB SDRAM with some use of swap, but no excessive thrashing[seeks]. YMMV.
 
 
If sub-spec, your system may lock up after 2-10 minutes.  Alternatively,
`burnBX` is especially likely to terminate with an error.  It shouldn't.
burn* are just unpriviliged user processes.  But it probably means your
CPU is undercooled, most likely no thermal grease or other interface
material between CPU & heatsink.  Or some other deficiency.  A power
cycle should reset the system.  But you should fix it.
 
The cpuburn programs  are  copyright, but I grant a licence under the
GNU Public Licence 2.0 .  See http://www.gnu.org .  This is free
software, free as in speech, not as in beer.  Also known as
"Open Source".  The source code is in the *.s files.
 
 
Robert Redelmeier  redelm@ev1.net
 
*** WARNING ***    This program is designed to heavily load CPU chips.
Undercooled, overclocked or otherwise weak systems may fail causing data
loss (filesystem corruption) and possibly permanent damage to electronic
components.  Nor will it catch all flaws.   *** USE AT YOUR OWN RISK ***


Message édité par AsSaSsIne le 27-09-2003 à 16:55:44
Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 16:54:21   

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 17:06:07    

[:azylum]

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 17:19:52    

Ce programme est fait pour faire chauffer et tester la stabiliter de ton processeur il n'apporteras rien de mieux a part un gain "éventuel" en cas d'overcloking.


Message édité par steve_tho le 27-09-2003 à 17:20:22
Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 17:23:55    

:lol: un ami m'a envoyé un programme denomé CPUBURN4 qui apperement optimiserai la puissance du CPU  :lol:  mince toast, PiFats, prime95 servent a optimiser un CPU....et non pas a verifier sa stabilité en cas d'O/C !!! [:lex]  
 
ton pote s'est planté quelque part je crois ! ;)


---------------
PORTFOLIO - STAR CITIZEN parrainage : STAR-GQFY-QZXB
Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 17:24:36    

Ho d'accord , je pensais qu'il servais surtout si on overcloké pas ...  
 
Merci pour l'infor  :jap:

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 17:27:32    

oula je comprend plus  
 

Citation :

mince toast, PiFats, prime95 servent a optimiser un CPU....et non pas a verifier sa stabilité en cas d'O/C !!! [:lex]  
 
ton pote s'est planté quelque part je crois ! ;)


 
CPUBURN4 sert a tester la stab en cas d'OC  
et  
mince toast, PiFats, prime95 servent a optimiser un CPU non O/C ?

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 18:05:27    

non ces logiciels permettent de faire bosser le processeur pour etre sur de sa stablitée  :D

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 19:02:48    

Ha oki  :pt1cable:  
 
Escusez mon ignorance  :lol:  
 
Merci Bcp  :hello:

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 19:38:49    

eu fait , change d ami  [:ddr555]


---------------
Mangez de la salade !!
Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 20:25:27    

Tout tut Danger...

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 20:25:27   

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 22:18:39    

escaflownn a écrit :

eu fait , change d ami  [:ddr555]  


-1 non non +1
euh, en fait -1 qd mm [:ruxx]

Reply

Marsh Posté le 27-09-2003 à 22:20:58    

:lol:  :lol:


---------------
PORTFOLIO - STAR CITIZEN parrainage : STAR-GQFY-QZXB
Reply

Sujets relatifs:

Leave a Replay

Make sure you enter the(*)required information where indicate.HTML code is not allowed